This may be appropriate but only if authors report on how the image has been edited (e.g. When preparing a manuscript, authors should refer to a recent issue of the Journal and follow the detailed instructions given below. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. The structure of the review report varies between journals. Read Wiley's Top 10 Publishing Ethics Tips for Authors here. Aims and Scope. This is extremely important to keep the peer review process moving forward smoothly and quickly. Your manuscript will be thoroughly reviewed by at least three of your peers with the goal of validating and improving the content prior to publication. Our policy on posting, licensing, citation of preprints and communications with the media about preprints of primary research manuscripts is summarized below. [CDATA[// > Are there places where meaning is ambiguous? If not, what would be required to make their case credible? Sci-hub struck at the heart of the oligopoly of purely commercial publishers, which includes Elsevier and Wiley, who run scientific publishing like a fiefdom, charging exorbitant subscriptions or publishing fees, making exponential profits, and treating the intellectual output of scientists and institutions as if it was all their personal property. After posted here, I contacted the editor and she replied that they received one reviewer's comment but couldn't get any feedback from the second reviewer. However, this doesn't give reviewers permission to 'backstab' the author. Try to bear in mind the following questions - they'll help you form your overall impression: While you should read the whole paper, making the right choice of what to read first can save time by flagging major problems early on. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); Dear Mohammad Jakir Hosen sir, thank you so much for the response. Under Review: This status indicates that the manuscript has entered the review process. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. Conflict of Interest. If you still intend to recommend rejection, see the section "When recommending rejection.". If recommending revision, state specific changes you feel need to be made. Usually, if there is a desk rejection, it happens quite soon, within the first few days. Are there certain aspects that could be communicated better, such as parts of the discussion? Xian Yang, Pandeng Wang, Bowen Xiao, Qianna Xu, Qiang Guo, Shao-peng Li, Lulu Guo, Meifeng Deng, Jianbo Lu, Lingli Liu, Keping Ma, Bernhard Schmid, Lin Jiang. The Second Read-Through: Section by Section Guidance, Criticisms & Confidential Comments to Editors. This could help them with future submissions. //--> hotstar interview leetcode services@everythingwellnessdpc.com (470)-604-9800 ; precision exams login Facebook. The title should contain the relevant SEO terms early on. Editorial Policies. crash in glendale, az Order Supplement. Abstract As one approach to publicising sustainability efforts at the local level for a wider audience, international resource management certification schemes and their eco-label programmes have b. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Try to respond to invitations promptly - it will prevent delays. Further instructions will be emailed to you from ScholarOne. The MDPI Editorial Process. Are all tables and figures appropriate, sufficient, and correctly labelled? Collaborate easily and accurately: Edit your manuscript together, in real-time with your collaborators with workflow management tools that can be tailored to the way you like to work. They said reviews had just come back and that another editor was preparing the decision. Don't spend time polishing grammar or spelling. We hypothesize that this response is caused by leaf structural change associated with altered tissue water status; under cold winter conditions, leaves often remove water from their mesophyll cells, preventing intracellular freezing, as ice formation within the cells of the leaves is deadly (Steponkus, 1984; Li & Christersson, 1993; Buchanan et . Phd at snhu 2 . If you have submitted a manuscript, you'll be able to log in to Editorial Manager (EM) as the corresponding author to view the status of your submission. . CrossCheck The journal employs a plagiarism detection system. Avoid the use of the word 'significant' in your description of results. Other journals require a more formal approach. Are the correct references cited? Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Under Review: This status indicates that the manuscript has entered the review process. Following the invitation to review, when you'll have received the article abstract, you should already understand the aims, key data and conclusions of the manuscript. Ritardo Rogito Per Colpa Banca, Expect to suggest such amendments - it's rare for a manuscript to pass review with no corrections. 2002 Last month I got the reviewers' comments and submitted the revised manuscript in early July. As you're reading through the manuscript for a second time, you'll need to keep in mind the argument's construction, the clarity of the language and content. TCE Subject Editors' Areas of Expertise for Submitting Authors Where improvements are needed, a recommendation for major or minor revision is typical. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. Read this article till the end to get answers to all your questions. Hey ,, this happpened to my manuscript just yesterday, what can I expect ? You might not require more epoch to spend to go to the ebook creation as without difficulty as search for them. //-->
