This wasn't bad however, the taste was just OK to me. High. Not perfectly cut and portioned flakes as with others. I really enjoyed this one and of course it is no longer available. Due to this I primarily smoke and enjoy stronger blends. Thus I feel confident in stating with a degree of certainty that the width of the flakes has a decisive effect on the flavor of this blend: the thinner the flakes, the more the unique essence of Bracken comes through; thicker flakes are more difficult to smoke, and are not as flavorful. Here, however, it is applied sparingly. 250g. Quality tobaccos with weird flavouring added. A must try for all pipe smokers. I'm in the mood for something classical and satisfying. Tonquin and carrots are the tastes I get off this very fine flake. Part of it could be the age difference of the tins (fresh with the 1792, years with the Bracken), but the Bracken is deeper, richer, and earthier. Purchased From: The factory, various tobacconists. Join over 18k members to reviewexclusive content. The SG Full Virginia flake is good but this..I've said enough already. A big thanks to StevieB for sending me this in a trade. There's also a note of hay from the Virginia, this is like a breath of fresh air against the heavy taste. In fact, the color is very much like Stonehaven, as is the full, not-biting creamy body, though the taste is of course different. 24.30 It is fairly dry for a scented flake, but the scenting is just a touch or so. Have enjoyed pipe smoking, again, for almost 5 years now and have tried a number of Blends all of which have been recommended by my supplier. Published review content of this website is considered the Probably because the SG Kentucky and Dark Fired burleys are so overpowering on their own. Home Stretch: As end of the bowl approaches, I find that it becomes more intense though never overpoweringly so. In this regard, I think it's better than Bosun Cut Plug or Conniston Cut Plug. When it comes to this one however, they seem to be all over the place. I cannot tell much about this that would be constructive, but if, like me, you tried 1792 and found it over-flavored but liked where it was going, then Bracken Flake is quite possibly a fit for you. It's hard to keep lit, like 1792 for this reason. I got loopy halfway through, and just could not take any more. Created with Sketch . For a full, dark tobacco taste, it is hard to beat. One of my local B&M's have SG stuff in stock. One of the reasons for this is that I find Bracken Flake's flavor profile so elusive that I keep being drawn to it to try to plumb its depths. Slow burning, sips nicely. I crumbled up a flake and then I noticed the sweet smell of their secret sauce. The flavouring (a combination of essences of the like of bergamot, anise) is applied very coherently, the true tobacco base is never hidden. A bit hard to light staight from the tin, so let it dry out a bit by leaving the tin open over night. If you've never had it, it tastes exactly like the tin aroma on the finish. This burns moderately well, yields a good volume of smoke and is more than satisfying from one bowls worth of indulgence. Probably my reaction to the dark fired leaf. Taste is full. Braken Flake is supposedly "of a lesser density than 1792", whatever that means. That being said, if you like 1792, you should try this too. Celtic Talisman. Virginia. Online Exclusive Price: 18.49 Regular Price: 19.79. The second thing was a sweetish, artificial tin aroma that immediately transported me to my childhood, when my parents forced a cheap cough syrup on me. Nice on a rainy Saturday morning when there is nothing much to do. I did not expect to like it, but was pleasantly surprised. As always with Samuel Gawith, the tobacco in tin is soaking wet. Perhaps there is a suggestion of chocolate on the after-taste, with the slightest hint of spice? Overall, very dark, with occasional bright flashes. The pouch aroma is very rich, peaty and much like 1792. Admittedly all these cross-references to 1792 may be a bit confusing: These are two tobaccos at completely different ends of the flavour range. Hoping to purchase BF in bulk. I've never tasted a burned porta-potty, but it might just taste like Braken flake. Samuel Gawith 1792 Flake 250g. Slightly floral, perfume-like, sweet, with a vanilla undertone. Black, broken tarry flakes with minute crystals. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. And yes, this is a Virginia/Burley with flavoring that I find to be delicious. I could never smoke this as an all day blend, but it is great with a cold beer or cup of coffee. It is powerful, and not unpleasant; but too much of it leaves me with a pain in my throat. Not very savory, no high notes, no ''obvious'' notes. This tobacco was recommended to me after my tobacconist was out of a virginia blend that i was looking for. What else can I say? This has to be considered as a very robust smoke. Either that, or the flavouring is so well matched that it seems to not be overwhelming or floating atop the taste of the tobacco. Cant wait to smoke it in the Winter while drinking a cup of Turkish Coffee. However, I don't think I want to pay 15.00 a 50g tin for the cheaper ones. What a shame it is that this wonderful flake is discontinued! Email Rich at 4noggins.com, he put some aside for you the next time it arrives, he's a good guy. The first bowl smoked pretty dry, though a little steamy, the airing out helps tremendously with this one. If I had to guess I would say the base tobaccos are the same, but the topping is very different. At first smoke it was a tobacco I wanted to take back even thought I knew I'd have to fight my only decent tobacconist. After leaving this tobacco out all night, it was still not completely dry, so I may try leaving it under a lamp for a while next time. It came a bit more moist than 1792 and I had to let it dry a few hours before sealing up in a Ball jar. As usual my yardstick for tobacco comparison is Petersons Old Dublin. Beware, and be amazed. This tobacco, when crumbling apart, becomes sticky and leaves a brown residue on your hands. Samuel Gawith - Bracken Flake Edit this tobacco Favorite Wishlist Subscribed We have blended a carefully balanced selection of Kentucky & dark fired leaf to give this medium to strong flake. Many people compare this to 1792. I can see this becoming a problem for me, as I only have one tin left, and I will open it as soon as I get home Come on in and meet 1792's little brother!!! I dont know for sure. Samuel Gawith St. James Flake Pipe Tobacco, Samuel Gawith Full Virginia Flake Pipe Tobacco, Samuel Gawith Perfection Mixture Pipe Tobacco, Samuel Gawith Squadron Leader Pipe Tobacco, 44621 Guilford Drive Suite 130 Ashburn, VA 20147. Smells of rich, deep earth, and just straight up tobacco. ** 4 full stars. The only similarity it has to 1792, is it's a densely pressed flake of many layers. I get only a mild added taste at first, and it's quite pleasant: maybe vanilla like. The Kentucky and dark-fired leaf offer a lot of earth, some nuttiness, minor spice notes, molasses, a little cocoa, smoke and wood with a slight sharpness. The only thing I have to compare this to is the Brown No. That might have something to do with the age of the tobacco, as I smoke this it has been out of production for three years so this tin is at least that old, but I really couldn't say since I never had the pleasure of trying a fresh tin. The nicotine hit is very intense. I would recommend this to the learned smoker as this could prove to be harsh and off putting to the beginner. But the smoke is far more understated, so don't be put off. UPDATE (a day later): No, I have to give it four stars. I was just happy that the soapy taste was totally absent from this Lakeland. Two of four stars. E&OE. It is very deep and smooth but powerful. Think I'm gonna YAK! ), this dissipates after being open for a while, it also lessens with age. While flavor should be the most important factor in choosing a tobac, some are just too darn fickle to deal with (like McClellands Dark Star). Related Products Customers Also Viewed I get hints of unsweetened cocoa and a pronounced woody character overall. Harrison passed the company and equipment down to his son-in-law, Samuel Gawith, whose company . The taste is a little closer to full than it is to medium, and its strength straddles the line between medium to full. Lastly, I had trouble keeping this stuff lit and producing an acceptable amount of smoke. BF burns slowly, even when bone dry, and there is no tongue burn. I have increased the time to a full hour for this review smoke. Pipe Used: MM Dagner Poker, Country Gentleman, Marcus, Purchased From: acquired in trade (Thanks Steve). At this point I was about ready to trade it off, but decided to give it one more try in a couple of days. The last half of the bowl is the best,the Kentucy and Virginias are perfectly matched and have deepened in flavor and strength,but not overly so.Try your hardest to get bit by the Bracken,it just wont happen.This is a very satisfying smoke that burns cool and clean.I have not DGT'd this but suspect it might do well.If you enjoy dark and robust tobacs you'll find a winner here. I see the similarities in strength (Dark Flake) and flavor (1792) but neither is really accurate. If you find a tin around, buy it and try it. The rest of the flavour's robust: earthy, woody, bold, and fired. As a regular V Flake smoker with occasional touch on English mix, my first try on this Flake was really harsh, I thought id never finish this 50g. ALL images are Copyrighted and NOT for open use. Though, to again quote the email, it has been "permanently" removed from their inventory). It comes quite moist & needs to be dried out for a while. The "essence" is hard to detect, one is just aware of good quality tobacco which burns slow and smooth. Read more. No thank you. Once lit, seems to need a bit more draw than other flakes. It is too strongly flavoured. This must be what Bracken is for. Though not bitey, it is harsher on the throat than 1792 IMO, and less flavorful. Most all of my usual sources now have S. Gawith in-stock!! In the tin are dark rough cut flakes with a strong aroma - raisins, figs, aniseed, cough medicine, sweaty. It takes a light with no difficulty, and burns long and slow. The only drawback for me is that it is the only tobacco where I have to have a glass of water on hand, because it inevitably starts to tickle the back of my throat and will give me the hiccups if I don't drink a little water when smoking it. When smoked gently this stuff blossoms for me and developes gently as the tobacco is consumed. This flake was little too much for my taste. Don't try this tobacco after a strong earthy one like 1792; the subtle flavors are lost and it tastes just like a mild 1792. A full strength, full flavored pipe tobacco. But like all flavored blends, even when the underlying tobacco is great, as it is here, if you don't like the added flavor, it is going to be a no go. The flavoring is not overdone, nor is it the same as in other Gawith blends. It's just too good. Purchased From: Gotteftermaten.se in Sweden. I guess the experience is trending in the right direction though. Unfortunately we cannot ship tobacco outside of the UK. All in all, between the two I would smoke 1792 flake but this would be a good replacement foor those times 1792 is scarce. But there are times when I want a strong, sipping smoke. Purchased From: Friend personal collection. I liked it; my wife did not like the way it smelled. The smoking experience is singular. I am guessing that the flavor additive is tonkin bean because it has that peculiar sweetness of 1792, another favorite. Samuel Gawith Tinned Pipe Tobaccos. Black XX was 17.00 a 50g tin. I find I need more than the average number of relights but this tends to pace the smoke , so I don't consider it a problem. Both times I smoked it in a small bowl. We are committed to providing our services only to people who are of the proper age, and to protecting our youth as best as we possibly can. The tins I have smoked needed to dry out. Bought it, and haven't seen any more since. Where 1792's tonquin topping is over the top and Sam's Flake is too light to be noticed, Bracken Flake's topping shines. This is a weird one when I opened the tin, the first thought that came to my mind was soap. , , Felipe Felipe- Super Rothschild (Singles), Galleria tobaccos 1.5 ounce pouch (CLOSEOUT). The smell in the tin IMO smells like pine tar or cedar oil.The taste of the smoke is quite different however and I (almost) like it,though I tasted no black cherry. I taste the topping on the back of my palate but, surprisingly, it is not nearly as strong as the tin aroma smells. I also get a bare essence of vanilla from the tonquin. I'd compare it to 1792, just in terms of the amount of top-note. On to the review. I do not find the tin aroma to be particularly strong but I can see how some might make the observation of a medicine smell. This was an unexpected and pleasant surprise. I am pleasantly surprised at its consistant fullness and love the 'plain jane' feel of the smoke. As for the tonquin present in and strength of this blend, Bracken Flake is more companionable than 1792 Flake, but BF is still quite full and best on a full stomach. This is an encouraging thing to me as Condor is not available in the USA anymore. It is also slightly spicy and contains notes of cocoa and honey. There are occasional wafts of cherry and anise in the background. Samuel Gawith: 1792 FLAKE 50g; Samuel Gawith: 1792 FLAKE 50g SG1792-50g. With a smaller bowl this was not a problem, and the strength was noticeable, but enjoyable. As with most Lake District flakes which come this moist, I like to rub it out right away before it dries, into a broken ribbon for easy packing. No bite with a noticable nicotine content.not much if any flavor. It takes some sitting down and really focusing on it, as this dark blend simply won't let the smoker off the hook until it is finished. You're a better man than me Gunga Din! I have recently reset all my reviews because I feel that only now I really know what blends I enjoy and now have the experience to accurately give an honest review based on my personal tastes. It feels like so many of the reviews for Bracken Flake mention it's related to 1792. But still there is a flavoring of some sort that I find difficult to describe. Add to Wish List Description This 200 year old blend is comprised of hand-stripped flue cured Zimbabwe leaf, steamed to a golden color then stoved into a unique melange of flavors. Samuel Gawith: Brown No. A tobacco that should be stocked up on as age can do incredible things to the flavor of this spectacular blend. If only this came in a "lite" version. This is strong stuff, but smooth with it. I think if you take this tobac very slow it pays off. I've enjoyed this on climbing expeditions in the Lakes and Peaks, and in Scotland: perfect hill walking companion. Worth a try. Again, really smokes similar to a perique blend. It came across to me as some sort of spicy, peppery, syrup flavor. It doesn't lack strength in any department: strong nicotine, very full flavour, and an exceedingly strong room-note; not one to smoke in company. It is made from the finest tobacco leaves by artisan Eduardo Ribera. Not with this particular tin. Bracken is one of them. This puts it just ahead of the Peterson University flake. I love it when Gawith tells you something is flavored with a "long used essence." It deserves it: it's a masterpiece of the dark flake genre. I was provided this from a friend in our small local pipe club to sample. This frustrates me because it makes me wonder just how infectious some ideas are. People in this forum have complained about various things with this blend. Type at least 3 characters for suggestions, Boveda Humidity Control for Tobacco & Cigars, Hand Rolling Cigarette Filter Tips & Papers, https://www.smoke-king.co.uk/tobaccos/pipe-tobacco/samuel-gawith-pipe-tobacco, 10g Sample - Samuel Gawith Squadron Leader Pipe Tobacco, 10g Sample Samuel Gawith Best Brown Pipe Tobacco, 10g Sample | Samuel Gawith | 1792 Flake Pipe Tobacco, 10g Sample | Samuel Gawith | B C Cavendish (Black Cherry) Pipe Tobacco, 10g Sample | Samuel Gawith | Black Forest Pipe Tobacco, 10g Sample | Samuel Gawith | Commonwealth Pipe Tobacco, 10g Sample | Samuel Gawith | Fire Dance Flake Pipe Tobacco, 10g Sample | Samuel Gawith | Full Virginia Flake Pipe Tobacco, 10g Sample | Samuel Gawith | Golden Glow Pipe Tobacco, 10g Sample | Samuel Gawith | Grousemoor Pipe Tobacco, 10g Sample | Samuel Gawith | Sam's Flake Pipe Tobacco, 10g Sample | Samuel Gawith | Skiff Mixture Pipe Tobacco, Gawith Hoggarth | Reunion Series Brown House Rolls | 25g Loose, Gawith Hoggarth | Reunion Series | No 27 Pipe Tobacco | 25g Loose, Gawith Hoggarth | Reunion Series| Reunion Flake Pipe Tobacco | 25g Loose, Samuel Gawith | 1792 Flake Pipe Tobacco | 25g Loose, Samuel Gawith | 1792 Flake Pipe Tobacco | 50g Tin, Samuel Gawith | B C Cavendish (Black Cherry) Pipe Tobacco | 50g Tin, Samuel Gawith | Balkan Flake Pipe Tobacco | 50g Tin, Samuel Gawith | Best Brown Flake Pipe Tobacco | 50g Tin, Samuel Gawith | Black Forest Pipe Tobacco | 50g Tin, Samuel Gawith | Bothy Flake Pipe Tobacco | 50g Tin, Samuel Gawith | C H Flake (Chocolate) Pipe Tobacco | 50g Tin, Samuel Gawith | Cabbie's Mixture Pipe Tobacco | 50g Tin. This is REAL tobacco!! An excellent Virginia & Latakia blend with a pleasant rum flavor. The smoke is very cool and there is absolutely no tongue bite. It is full bodied with some underlying flavoring of chocolate. Comparisons to 1792 are apt, it's in the same vein. Duck and cover, this Swamp Thing is on the ATTACK! It is earthy, a little sweet and slightly spicy. Smokes very cool and as long as one hour in the smallest group 1 bowl which is pretty enough to satisfy the smoker. I might get it again, but it won't be something I'm craving after. A down right good dark lakeland flake. After proper preparations it is a dry and biteless smoke that will require some relights. For those who are looking for a milder tobacco that still delivers that tanginess on the back of the tongue with a little sweetness on the front, this could be an all day smoke, nothing complex but the flavor is interesting. It reminds me well, of bracken! Contact us for further information and photos, all taxes included. I tried it few more times after some extensive drying periods, not so much to let it dry but to let the casing dissipate and then it was somewhat better to smoke but not much. As for the strenght noted by other reviewers, since i smoked it in a rather small bowl, i didnt feel it at all (and i am no nicotine heavyweight). My favorite of the SG line. The fired leaf is more apparent, and a bitter chocolate taste appears at times. Great tasting tobacco with repulsive aroma. I do not think there is any Tonka Bean in this, thank goodness. It is perfect for arguing with wife and escape to the bar. This also allowed the slight smokiness of Bracken to shine (a dry smoke, peperry smoke, not campfire-ish), due to the DFK i suppose (at this moment i was reminded a bit of MacBaren Old Dark Fired). I worry about their mental and physical well-being. I won't give Bracken 4 stars as I feel it is inferior to the likes of FVF and 1792 but I find it quite enjoyable and will continue to keep it in my Lakeland rotation as it just agrees with my palate. It is a blend that needs to be smoked for a while to be fully appreciated, especially since it's so full-flavored. But if you don't do those, you fill find a sweet taste on the tip of your tongue. What is possible is nicotine overload for the uninitiated, smoke in a small pipe if that's an issue. Monochromatic, if not for the spice. It is very much like Gawith & Hoggarth's Dark Flake, with some sort of essence added. Taste is on the mild/medium side and the nicotine is medium. I rubbed out a bowlful quantity and dried it a short while. When ready to load my third bowl, I had an epiphany (soft of like gas but not the same) - maybe the guys I read about that open tobacco and let it dry know something I don't. "They Don't Make 'Em Like That Anymore". That tradition continues today and it's evident in every bowl. Everyone else should bum a bowl from a friend before buying. For this review, I?ve chosen an Edward's Husky Canadian which is dedicated to scented flakes. It's not the kind of enjoyment I look forward in a pipe. I'm amazed I've not yet reviewed this flake, which may be my favorite tobacco of all time. There is something of the nature of the ever-controversial 1792 lurking in the physical aspect of Bracken, but the similarities end there. (Don't microwave it, since that seems to compromise the fragile oils and alter the flavor characteristics.) The tin aroma is muddy and unpleasant but the smoke is rich, full and satisfying. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. This was my first try of a dark flake. Some flakes are thick and some not so much, so youll have told determine how you want to prepare them. I just keep on trying the SG flakes and each one keeps coming up a winner. I don't get it. The kinship with 1792 is undeniable, but thankfully, without the large dose of Tonquin. Once you get it lite it's quite good. Similar Blends: Samuel Gawith - 1792 Flake, Samuel Gawith - Brown No. I recommend a try, it is a very pleasant smoke. Not highly complex but very delicious. I'd give it three stars except for the burn and slight bite. I loved it! I love it. Definitely not for the first timer. Initial flavor: Very full, smokey taste from the dark fired leaf. On first light you get an immediate creamy smoke with a spicy sourish taste coupled with a light fruity/vanilla/musk undertones that come from the tonquin topping. I have also concluded that honey is part of the topping. it reminds me of old lady perfume counter smells. It smells like soap. The company originated in 1792 with Thomas Harrison, who was a notable and popular maker of snuff tobacco. info@ronscigarstore.com (647) 887-7088. A good deal darker (in looks and taste) and fuller than Rum Flake, I find it equally as sweet, but in a different way, and as strong or stronger than Rum Flake as well. It packed much easier and lit easily as well. An idea came up to mix these two to get a balanced taste and more complexity, it works well, and more interesting when change the portion of Bracken. The tobacco shows lots of light and dark brown leaves. I should have smoked it in a smaller bowled pipe. Love this blend and will keep it in my rotation. 2001-2023 STC Holdings LLC, a division of Mac Baren USA. I found that drying it under a bright light for 15-45 minutes or so until it's a little stiff (but not brittle) brought it to life. Pipe Used: Rattray's Bulldog, St. Regis Prince, Age When Smoked: 6 years, 10 years (2011). The taste is somewhat blah and undistinguished but the overall strength of the blend is immediate from puff one and the nicotine hit too major for my tastes. Stronger than Goliath it packs a punch few will shrug off, but a slow cadence treats the patient smoker to a sunset of impressions. SG Flakes are the best in terms of preparation and smoking qualities, that all adds to the overall 4 star ranking I give Bracken Flake. Whenever one of those appears here on tobaccoreviews.com, that usually means it is a stout tobacco. Definitely one for smoking in a small bowl. It also has a trange flaovring. Pipe Used: Bent billiard, straight apple, corncobs. Comparisons to 1792 are apt in my opinion. Be that as it may, the flake is dark and wet. It is way too high in nicotine to be an all-day smoke. Samuel Gawith Navy Flake is a classic blend made with a classic formula. But smoked slow and respectfully, it will give you a very unique and great experience. For goodness sake, take it BACK! I almost ruined my pipe! If you receive this confirmation repeatedly, you will need to enable cookies so that your response can be saved. He said Bracken Flake was a virginia (which i already knew) and would be different, but that I'd like it. It can get bitter in the last 3rd and I don't usually get good DGT results with this blend. Aroma: Strong and pungent, almost cigarish in aroma. Lots of people purposefully dry out their tobacco to a near crisp to reduce the presence of water. Rose you say? Quite a bit of the old stuff I have today is from what I bought. This tobacco is 5-year aged, so its appearance is dark with shiny specks in it, in a full flake form. Very coarse and quite difficult pack with more tobacco smell than anything else by the time it had aired. I'm not going to relate this to 1792 because I haven't tried it. I wish I had known this beforehand so I could have stocked up on it! I know it's a discontinued blend so a part of me was thinking about putting it in the cellar, but you know, the first thing I ended up doing when I got home was opening it up and having a smoke with some strong, black tea. It doesn't make my regular rotation due to its mono-dimensionality but it's a good smoke and one that should be tried by the smoker that is put off by 1792 but likes the richness. I had no problem with it funking my pipe though, or leaving any goop in the bottom of the bowl. This is a great blend for the experienced smoker, rich, bold and powerful with a unique topping that really adds a one of a kind character. I have read from other reviews due to the lack of selected tobacco or due to the scarcity of the essence used. Too bad. This is one of the finest virginias I've ever smoked. Ho-hum. Email Us | (888)366-0345 Account Login Create Account . It is a fine tobacco who wants to experience a tasty and satisfying smoke. Samuel Gawith are still famous for producing some of the best and most popular pipe tobaccos in the world. Samuel Gawith has been a producer of fine, premium tobacco products since 1792, using much of the same equipment and recipes dating back to the beginning. There is not a pipe tobacco company currently, or past, that epitomizes the word tradition more so than Samuel Gawith, with its recipes dating back to almost a decade before 1800. It's not something I reach for every day. Sadly there's no way of knowing what width of flake you'll get when you open a new tin, but I hope for my sake -- and all those who want to experience Bracken in all its glory -- there will be nothing but thinly cut flakes from now on UPDATE 04/28/15: I learned back in November ('14) that SG has removed Bracken from its inventory. I have to relite several times in the course of a bowl, but that is no big deal, as the smoke is very pleasant and sweet. Smoked, this was very good. Categories: Samuel Gawith, Tobacco Tins. If there is, it is below the radar. As with most flake tobaccos I simply take several flakes together, fold them in half and insert them length-wise into the bowl trimming off the excess. I wanted a strong tobacco. I fully understand the 1 star reviews for this. This one is not for those smokers with weak constitutions. I found no tongue bite and enjoyed the smoke rather well. I miss the nuances of the flavors. I saw the new tin and had to try it; I'm glad I did. as the famous or infamous SG "1792", but still a full tobacco treat in terms of body and taste. For some reason I've particularly enjoyed the welter of voices trying to pin this one down UPDATE 05/31/13: I'm now on my fifth tin, and I'm a little concerned with SG's quality control. It rubbed out easily, and packed nicely. Some reviewers noted the inconsistent thickness of this flake from tin to tin: it seems i got a ''thick'' one. It's surprisingly mild: a bit of prune, a bit of apricot, as much tangy as sweet. $ 130.95 inc. GST There are lots of comparisons to 1792, but for my taste, the added flavoring in 1792 (Tonquin) is nothing like Bracken and I find the added flavors in Bracken to be less pronounced than 1792. =. Packing:. The tins seem to be pretty damp, so a good bit of drying time should be expected. I had found that the SG line of flakes were very inconsistently sized. The smell reminded me of Peterson's Irish Flake, but not near as strong. This is a mixture of Virginias and Kentuckys, with dark fired leaf. A first light is brings billows of rich white smoke, followed with a brief visit of the tamper and then a tamping light. I smoked all three bowls yesterday so that is all she wrote. I'll let the tobacco dry out more and try it again later, and update. Crowns up beautifully on the charring light. reproduced in any manner without the expressed written consent of STC Holdings LLC. Flavors of cherry, rose and a deep nuttiness are exhaled with increasing pleasure. I was also happy that it didn't have the heavier flavor of 1792, and I prefer BF's comparative subtleness. . A medium bodied-smoke that is easy to enjoy all day. This is an incomplete box, forgotten in a bag, there are the KC and bracken, because move, they should be sleeping in my memory for 15 years or so, each piece inside are covered with a layer of white frost, when (I was a young pipe smokers, may be the character of tobacco, stop to continue. Also gets a bit harsh in the mouth. Finish:. Thank goodness I found the last two tins in Canada at a brick & mortar in Toronto that I will cellar for as long as I can. The flakes are a little moist. By mid-bowl the fragrant topping is pretty well gone and the Kentucky leaf is coming into its own. I would definitely recommend this to anyone who likes dark flakes. Flavoring is attractive: not as sweet and tonquin dominated as 1792, but more "fresh" and "cool".
High Lakes Health Care Patient Portal,
Les Verset Du Coran Les Plus Puissant,
Articles S
